Warren County Report
April 16, 2010
Leaked memos may sink solar project, 100-plus jobs
Motives of town attorney,
confidential document-leaker questioned
By Roger
Bianchini
Hot on the
heels of the Front Royal Town council’s unexpected April 12th
rejection of its $100,000 RFP process on solar power proposals
described elsewhere in this issue, all hell broke loose on
April13—14 in the wake of the leak of an internal memo from Town
Attorney Tom Robinett to council. The leak,
cited as from an unnamed member of council, resulted in an April
14 front page banner Northern Virginia Daily
headline: “Town attorney: Incentives taint solar
project.” The cited
town attorney memo references March 30th inquiries
from two unnamed councilmen following a March 29 closed session,
about whether the so-called incentives from Standard Energy
mentioned by Town Manager Michael Graham in closed session could
be construed as “bribes within the meaning to the law”.
Consequently Robinett sought an opinion from the Town
Manager Michael Graham says the referenced incentives have been
on the table from the outset of serious discussions with
SolAVerde in mid 2009 and never have been secret.
Graham has been at odds with Robinett and Councilmen
Carson Lauder and Chris Holloway over the dynamics of the
$100,000 RFP process versus Standard Energy/SolAVerde’s initial
private sector inquiry to the town dating to last spring.
The RFP process was initiated in December (see related
story) at Robinett’s urging. “This is
ridiculous,” Graham said when asked about the “bribe” inquiries
from council to the town attorney leaked to the local media by
sources within council.
“These are all things that were proposed as business
proffers. They are
incentives to the community that have been out there from the
outset. I’m not
getting anything, the town is.
This isn’t cloak and dagger stuff.”
Lack of trust Vice Mayor
Bret Hrbek seemed both angry and exasperated at the situation. “I’d like
to know if Carter Glass or his staff’s opinion would be the same
if they knew that all the offers or add-ons referenced were
related to the manufacturing facility, not the solar field
itself. That is my
understanding –they were all within the context of the
manufacturing facility, which was not part of the RFP proposals,
which were solely about the purchase and production of solar
power,” Hrbek said. Queried on
that and other issues related to the situation, Glass said he
could not comment because his communications with town staff on
the matter were covered by attorney-client privilege.
However, Vice Mayor Hrbek was talkative. “It’s like
Jean’s Jewelers donating the solar clock; it’s like American
Woodmark donating the wood for the benches around town and the
picnic tables at the Luray boat landing; and Lowe’s donating all
the plantings around town.
Is Jean’s Jewelers bribing us?
Is American Woodmark or Lowe’s?
I mean when Walmart came they were writing checks to
different groups or departments around town to the police force
– are those bribes?” Hrbek asks. At issue
for Troutman Sanders attorney Raham within the framework
provided to her by Robinett is whether those “incentives” of
jobs and money tied to a solar power field or manufacturing
facility here could be considered illegal under any
circumstance. An
e-mail response to Robinett from Glass accompanying the staff
opinion noted that there could be liability issues if the offers
were made “in secret” in order to impact the RFP process.
At issue under state code for Raham were economic gain to
the entity which the person to whom the offer is made has an
interest. She writes
that since to her understanding the town manager is the official
to whom the offers were conveyed and since Graham has an
interest in the town’s well being, her reading of the offer of
jobs and revenue for community incentives could be construed as
a violation of Virginia code section 18.2-445(I).
However, she adds that if the offer is not accepted no
bribe occurs… and Standard Energy and the Town of That legal
limbo has Vice Mayor Hrbek fuming and asking more questions. “I’d
like to know who the two councilmen Mr. Robinett cited as
asking about bribes on March30th were.
And I wonder who gave Mr. Robinett the authority to go to
Carter Glass for an opinion?
Mr. Glass was contracted to handle the corridor suit.
And he appeared to have an associate prepare the response
based entirely on the facts provided by Mr. Robinett.
We pay Mr. Robinett for those opinions,” Hrbek said,
offering that Troutman Sanders did not throw out opinions for
free. “There is
no trust in town hall any longer.
There is no trust between staff members.
I try not to contribute to such a situation but is has
gotten out of hand,” the vice mayor said bluntly.
Mayor’s perspective “What
bothers me more than anything is that we can’t keep anything
confidential anymore.
There appear to be one or two members of council that
take everything to the press.
I don’t know where they’re coming from but I do know we
all took an oath of office to uphold the best interests of the
town and confidentiality on legal communications or closed
session discussions is a part of that,” the mayor said. Tewalt also
agreed with Hrbek that the town attorney had overstepped his
bounds in seeking an outside legal opinion.
“He shouldn’t have gone to anyone until he got
authorization from the town council,” the mayor said of
Robinett’s inquiry to Glass. However
Tewalt said he did not believe the incidents and consequent
abandonment of the RFP process had doomed the solar proposal,
nor Standard Energy’ role in it.
“Not at all- Those proffers or whatever you want to call
them have been in discussion at least since last September or
October outside the RFP process, actually months before it.
I think now we can let private enterprise take its
course,” the mayor stated.
An appointed opinion “We were
directed by the town attorney to send out the RFP’s .
We were also advised by the town attorney to reject all
the RFP’s,” Shae Parker told us in response to question about
how the brewing controversy erupted.
“I don’t know what the wording of Mr. Robinett’s inquiry
to the “As far as
back door negotiations, secret meetings—my understanding of any
discussions that occurred were that they were of a type that is
typical of the contract negotiations process.
Incentives to the town never came forward as part of the
RFP process. There
were discussions about scholarships, bringing jobs to the
community. But I don’t understand the idea that jobs could be
considered a bribe.
I think a condition of EDA approval of leasing land at Avtex to
them was that a number of permanent jobs be created. “But now
between the bad press, and bad egos and bad feelings all around,
I am more concerned about those trying to derail something that
could be good for the community that would bring jobs, bring
scholarships for our children and green, sustainable energy to
the community,” Parker concluded.
Defense attorney Told he had
been criticized for the third party inquiry based on the
questions of two councilmen regarding potential illegalities in
the RFP process, Robinett said only that his interpretation of
his job description by code and town charter allowed such
discussions. “I do it
every day – the difference here was that with such a serious
allegation I wanted a second set of eyes to verify my opinion,”
Robinett explained.
Quoting form the town code Robinett referenced his job
description as having “charge, management and control of all
legal affairs of the town…” “When two
members of council call me and ask if bribes are being taken
should I have to wait till the full council meets again to act
on it? That’s never
been the way of it previously,” the town attorney concluded.
A professional opinion
Councilman
Tom Conkey told us that during his professional life with
Raytheon he had spent 35 years in procurement and major
subcontracts. “So my
area of expertise is wit the RFP process,” he told us.
The allegations of “bribes” seem frivolous to him because
the town’s consultant GDS handled “the whole RFP process ‘from
cradle to grave’ as they used to call it, as I did,” Conkey
explained.
Consequently, consultant GDS prepared, sent out, evaluated, and
summarized their findings on the RFP’s for the town’s purchase
of solar power. “So any
allegations of bribes, were they true which I don’t believe they
are, are irrelevant to the RFP process which was handled
entirely out of the town’s hands,” Conkey asserts. “There are
two kinds of companies, one that comes into a community and
takes and takes and gives nothing back.
Then there are companies that come in and make themselves
a part of that community, whether it be by offering jobs,
donating benches, whatever.
In our discussions with Willi [Lauterbach]
from the outset, his stance was that SolAVerde wanted to
be the latter type—come in and be a good corporate citizen,
whether it be with the creation of jobs through the
manufacturing plant as part of their business plan, offering
infrastructure support, scholarships, whatever.
It was never a quid pro quo do something for me.
I’ll do something for you, which is typically what
bribery is,” Conkey said.
Insider
trading? However,
both Holloway and Lauder are suspicious of the involvement of
the town manager in
the ongoing Standard Energy/SolAVerde negotiations. “Why is it so important that Standard Energy get the contract?” Holloway asks. He asserts that the town attorney witnessed what he recalled as a March 16 assertion by Graham the town could get $1.2 million from Standard if their Purchase Power Agreement (PPA) was accepted. Queried,
Robinett corrected the date to March 30, when he said he asked
Graham about incentives mentioned in closed session the previous
day, and of which he had been previously unaware.
It was then the town manager mentioned the $1.2 million
and 200 jobs to him as clarification, he said. One might
note the above conversation occurred two weeks after the town’s
consultant GDS had already endorsed Standard Energy at a March
15 council work session as the top applicant in both RFP
scenarios, PPA and Design-Build. Lauder has
been one of the primary critics, along with Holloway, of
Standard Energy’s ongoing private sector negotiations with
AMP-Ohio as the RFP process proceeded.
He was also part of the council trio that attempted to
oust Graham last year (along with Holloway and Sayre).
But while he may have been at its center, Lauder bemoaned
the deteriorating solar situation. It’s
something that got out of hand and wasn’t handled correctly”
Lauder said of the recent legal inquiry and media leak.
“Did I want to disrupt or derail the solar
project—absolutely not.
But the numbers on energy costs just didn’t work out,” he
added of his perspective of the abandoned RFP’s. “There is a
thought that we wasted $100,000 on the RFP process,” Lauder
added. “But I prefer
to look at it as we possibly saved $18 million if we’d gone
along with that upfront investment for power purchase (Standard
Energy’s Steve Lamb approached council in late October about a
possible 14 year, $18 million up front purchase of solar power
to help startup funding for the solar field project.
Mayor Eugene Tewalt led a fairly harsh council reaction
to that option of Lamb’s face at that meeting.
The pre-purchase option has since been removed from the
table- see related solar update story).
Graham witch hunt? Original
SolAVerde partner and local businessman, Artic Air’s Greg Horton
was angered at insinuations of shady dealings by his company and
the nature of the initial reporting around those allegations.
He said revenue for scholarships or other community
benefits had long been discussed in amount from half million to
1.5 million and never as part of the RFP process. “I liken
this to the Salem witch hunts,” Horton said.
“There appear to be people within town hall that have
crested a witch hunt.
First it was our investors (Tom Sayre publicly targeted
potential SolAVerde investor Kent Swig in mid 2009); then it was
us a individuals (in fall of 2009 Sayere and Chris Holloway
targeted SolAVerde principal Willi Lauderbach, as well as fellow
councilman Tom Conkey, for the offer of weekday business
traveler discounts at Conkey’s bed &breakfast);then they turned
on Mike Graham,” Horton observed of a sequence of events. “It would
be a tragedy if one of the best things that could happen to this
community could be scrubbled by a few people who appear to have
personal agendas. I
mean all we’re trying to do is build a solar farm and a
production facility here that will provide jobs.
I just can’t believe some people will vilify anyone to
get there way. Maybe
they are so depressed about their own situation that they have
to drag others down with them to make themselves feel better. “To me it
is a tragedy for this community; it is an embarrassment for this
community; and it puts Front Royal in a bad light.
It appears it would take a miracle for Front Royal to get
this now. Too many
roadblocks are being
thrown up. But if
these people think they are going to stop us from doing what
we’re doing they are mistaken.
There are plenty of places that want this and will
welcome it with open arms.”(AMP-Ohio was in discussion with
another municipal partner, Danville, Va. For development of a
solar power project when they refocused on Front Royal after
being informed by town staff of the advanced stage of
talks between Standard Energy and the town.
Standard Energy is also in discussion in Fayetteville,
Tennessee, where a mirror image proposal to the one here has
been received “with open arms” at the local and state level,
Horton said. He
added that, that project, in the works for six months is coming
close to finalization as the one in discussion here for 11
months flounders under the weight of political infighting).
Counterpoint Both
Holloway and Lauder questioned the information flow leading to
the bribe inquiries. “In the RFP
there was no discussion on incentives to the town.
So why would they be discussed with anybody?” Holloway
wonders. “I didn’t
have a clue about incentives and Mike and Bret didn’t want to
discuss it. And I
don’t know where this scholarship came from.
There was no mention of scholarships that I was aware of.
And if there was, why didn’t I, Carson and Mr. Sayre
know? The whole thin
is screwy. I’m not
trying to derail this but here are lots of things going on
behind closed doors.” As for the
legal opinion on potential improprieties tied to the RFP
process, Lauder added, “If those offers were made prior to the
RFP’s that should have been made perfectly clear.
But the fact it wasn’t in the RFP’s seems to be a
problem.” Told some
involved believe there are personal agendas involved in
attempting to scrap the solar project and leak information to
the press to achieve that end, Holloway said, “My personal
agenda is looking out for the town.
I didn’t run to become mayor.
I ran to do the best for the community.” Asked about
an eye witness report he had discussed renting or selling his
vacant West Main Street duplex to SolAVerde’s Lauterbach last
year, Holloway said, “ Sure, yea- throw that out there too- I
sure did. Willi
wanted to rent my house but I said no, I was trying to sell it
and I never heard back from him.” The
witness, who asked for anonymity, said at the apparent end of a
conversation they heard Lauterbach tell Holloway, “Cheer up,
you’ll sell it eventually.” Lauterbach
could not be reached for comment on the discussion about
Holloway’s duplex.
A legal brief |